389COM-Open Source Development Assessment Criteria Prepared by:-Kang Leng 389COM Open Source Development- Assessment Rubric Marking Criteria CW1- Open Source Licenses Essay 40% CW2- Open Source Development 60% CW1 and CW2 Identify
and understand the impacts of software licensing with focus on open
source licensing. Identify and critically analyse open source software
and extend the software using appropriate software configuration and development tools. CW1
covers the following intended learning outcomes ILO2 and CW2 covers
(ILOS 1, 3 and 4 )of CU 389COM individual open source project: ILO1- Use a range of common tools for assisting with team software development. ILO2
– Demonstrate systematic understanding of the licencing, legal issues,
commonly held views regarding open-source, proprietary and other modes
of software development and distribution. ILO3 – Contribute to open-source projects at various stages of development, in a number of roles. ILO4 – Critically evaluate the issues of developing portable, multilingual software. 389COM-Open Source Development Assessment Criteria Prepared by:-Kang Leng Assessment Criteria – Coursework 1(Essay) – 40% Essay Mark Description of Licenses Chosen 24% ILO2 Legal / Ethical Aspects of Licensing 20% ILO2 Combination of Licenses / Relevance to projects with combined licensing – 26% ILO 2 Future codebase, examples of usage of license and conclusion 30% ILO2 FAIL (0-29) No explanation of licenses chosen No explanation of Legal or Ethical aspects No explanation of combined licenses or examples discussed No conclusion or discussion to impact on future codebase Narrow Fail (30-39) Identifies some licenses Identifies legal OR ethical aspects Identifies some combined licenses Brief conclusion or little discussion on impact on future codebase Pass (40-49) Identifies and briefly discusses aspects of licenses. Identifies and briefly discusses legal and ethical aspects Identifies and briefly discusses combined licensing Brief conclusion and little discussion on impact on future codebase Satisfactory (50-59) Most major aspects of licenses are identified. Some major implications of legal and ethical aspects identified and adequately discussed. Some combined licenses discussed with relevant examples. Adequate conclusion and some discussion on impact on future codebase Very Good (60-69) All major aspects of licenses are identified. All major implications of legal and ethical aspects are identified and adequately discussed. All major aspects of combined licensing discussed with some relevant examples Firm conclusion and some discussion on impact on future codebase Excellent (70- 85) Aspects of licenses are well defined discussed and justified. Aspects of implications of legal and ethical are well defined discussed and justified. Aspects of combined licensing are well defined discussed and justified with ample relevant examples Firm conclusion with justification and ample discussion on impact on future codebase Outstanding (85-100) Aspects of all licenses are well defined, discussed and justified with diagrams or illustrations. All aspects of all legal and ethical implications are well defined, discussed and justified with diagrams or illustrations. Aspects of all combined licensing are well defined, discussed and justified with diagrams or illustrations with ample relevant examples Firm conclusion with justification and ample discussion on impact on future codebase and examples 389COM-Open Source Development Assessment Criteria Prepared by:-Kang Leng Assessment Criteria – Coursework 2(Open Source Development) – 60% Essay Mark Description of Chosen Open Source Software. Registering interest with a community – 15% ILO1 Familiarisation of Open Source Software Chosen and choose a SE methodology – 9% ILO3 Contribute to open-source projects and Bug Fixing- 32% ILO3 Critically evaluate the issues of developing portable, multilingual software 4% ILO4 FAIL (0-29) No description of Chosen Open Source Software or Registration of Interest in a OS community No software critique or SE methodology discussed No contribution to open source project and no bug fix. No discussion on portable or multilingual issues Narrow Fail (30-39) Brief description of Chosen Open Source Software. No registration of Interest in a OS community Brief discussion on software source code and SE methodology Some discussion on features to be extended to chosen open source software Brief discussion on portable or multilingual issues Pass (40-49) Brief description of Chosen Open Source Software with architecture overview. Registration of Interest in a OS community shown Brief discussion on software source code and brief description on selection of appropriate SE methodology Some discussion on features to be extended to chosen open source software and a bug fix to be identified Brief discussion on impact on portable and multilingual issues Satisfactory (50-59) Description of Chosen Open Source Software with some architecture overview. Registration of Interest in a OS community shown Some discussion on software source code and description selection of appropriate SE methodology Some discussion on features to be extended to chosen open source software with implementation of a feature and a bug fix to be identified Adequate discussion on impact on portable and multilingual issues Very Good (60-69) Adequate description of Chosen Open Source Software with some architecture overview. Registration of Interest in a OS community shown Adequate discussion on software source code and description selection of appropriate SE methodology Adequate discussion on features to be extended to chosen open source software with implementation of 2 features and a bug fix to be identified Adequate discussion on impact on portable and multilingual issues with some relevant examples Excellent (70- 85) Adequate description of Chosen Open Source Software with good architecture overview. Registration of Interest in a OS community shown In depth discussion on software source code and description selection of appropriate SE methodology with relevant examples Adequate discussion on features to be extended to chosen open source software with implementation of 3 features and a bug fix to be implemented Adequate discussion on impact on portable and multilingual issues with some relevant examples and references Outstanding (85-100) Detailed description of Chosen Open Source Software with detailed architecture overview. Registration of Interest in a OS community shown In depth discussion on software source code and description selection of appropriate SE methodology with relevant examples and references Adequate discussion on features to be extended to chosen open source software with implementation of 3 features and a bug fix to be implemented and all major aspects covered Adequate discussion on impact on portable and multilingual issues with ample relevant examples and references 389COM-Open Source Development Assessment Criteria Prepared by:-Kang Leng
