Health Care CultureThe purpose of this assignment is to discuss health care culture and describe how CWV can be used to improve ethical practices. In a 1,000-1,250 word essay, discuss the important factors associated with health care culture. Include the following in your essay:A definition of health care culture, including culture of excellence and safety.Two or three examples of principles for building a culture of excellence and safety.An explanation of the role of various stakeholders in improving health care culture.An explanation of how Christian worldview (CWV) principles might be used by health care organizations to improve ethical practices, whether they are Christian or not.Two or three examples of how the integration of faith learning and work at GCU can be implemented by individuals to improve health care culture.This assignment requires a minimum of three scholarly sources.Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style GuideThis assignment uses a rubric. Health Care Culture RubricCollapse AllDefinition of Health Care Culture13.2 pointsCriteria DescriptionDefinition of Health Care Culture5. 5: Excellent13.2 pointsA definition of health care culture, including culture of excellence and culture of safety, is present and detailed.4. 4: Good12.14 pointsA definition of health care culture, including culture of excellence and culture of safety, is present and thorough.3. 3: Satisfactory11.62 pointsA definition of health care culture, including culture of excellence and culture of safety, is present.2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory10.56 pointsA definition of health care culture, including culture of excellence and culture of safety is present, but lacks detail or is incomplete.1. 1: Unsatisfactory0 pointsA definition of health care culture is not present.Examples of How to Build a Culture of Excellence and Culture of Safety14.4 pointsCriteria DescriptionExamples of How to Build a Culture of Excellence and Culture of Safety5. 5: Excellent14.4 pointsTwo or three examples of how to build a culture of excellence and a culture of safety are present and detailed. Most examples are appropriate.4. 4: Good13.25 pointsTwo or three examples of how to build a culture of excellence and a culture of safety are present and thorough. All examples are appropriate.3. 3: Satisfactory12.67 pointsTwo or three examples of how to build a culture of excellence and a culture of safety are present. Some examples are appropriate.2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory11.52 pointsTwo or three examples of how to build a culture of excellence and a culture of safety are not present.1. 1: Unsatisfactory0 pointsTwo or three examples of how to build a culture of excellence and a culture of safety are present, but lack details or are incomplete.Role of Various Stakeholders in Improving Health Care Culture14.4 pointsCriteria DescriptionRole of Various Stakeholders in Improving Health Care Culture5. 5: Excellent14.4 pointsAn explanation of the role of various stakeholders in improving health care culture is present and thorough.4. 4: Good13.25 pointsAn explanation of the role of various stakeholders in improving health care culture is present and detailed.3. 3: Satisfactory12.67 pointsAn explanation of the role of various stakeholders in improving health care culture is present.2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory11.52 pointsAn explanation of the role of various stakeholders in improving health care culture is present, but lacks detail or is incomplete.1. 1: Unsatisfactory0 pointsAn explanation of the role of various stakeholders in improving health care culture is not present.Explanation of How CWV Principles Might Be Used14.4 pointsCriteria DescriptionExplanation of How CWV Principles Might Be Used by Health Care Organizations to Improve Their Ethical Practices5. 5: Excellent14.4 pointsAn explanation of how CWV principles might be used by health care organizations to improve ethical practices is present and thorough.4. 4: Good13.25 pointsAn explanation of how CWV principles might be used by health care organizations to improve ethical practices is present and detailed.3. 3: Satisfactory12.67 pointsAn explanation of how CWV principles might be used by health care organizations to improve ethical practices is present.2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory11.52 pointsAn explanation of how CWV principles might be used by health care organizations to improve ethical practices is present, but lacks detail or is incomplete.1. 1: Unsatisfactory0 pointsAn explanation of how CWV principles might be used by health care organizations to improve ethical practices is not present.Examples of How the Integration of Faith, Learning, and Work14.4 pointsCriteria DescriptionExamples of How the Integration of Faith, Learning, and Work at GCU Can Be Implemented by Individuals to Improve Health Care Culture5. 5: Excellent14.4 pointsTwo or three examples of how the integration of faith, learning, and work at GCU can be implemented by individuals to improve health care culture are present and thorough.4. 4: Good13.25 pointsTwo or three examples of how the integration of faith, learning, and work at GCU can be implemented by individuals to improve health care culture are present and detailed.3. 3: Satisfactory12.67 pointsTwo or three examples of how the integration of faith, learning, and work at GCU can be implemented by individuals to improve health care culture are present.2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory11.52 pointsTwo or three examples of how the integration of faith, learning, and work at GCU can be implemented by individuals to improve health care culture are present, but lack details or are incomplete.1. 1: Unsatisfactory0 pointsTwo or three examples of how the integration of faith, learning, and work at GCU can be implemented by individuals to improve health care culture are not present.Scholarly Sources13.2 pointsCriteria DescriptionScholarly Sources5. 5: Excellent13.2 pointsA minimum of three scholarly sources are present. Sources are distinctive and address all of the requirements stated in the assignment criteria.4. 4: Good12.14 pointsTwo or three sources are present, but are not scholarly. Limited research is present.3. 3: Satisfactory11.62 pointsA minimum of three scholarly sources are present. Sources address all of the requirements stated in the assignment criteria.2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory10.56 pointsA minimum of three scholarly sources are present.1. 1: Unsatisfactory0 pointsScholarly sources are not present.Thesis Development and Purpose8.4 pointsCriteria DescriptionThesis Development and Purpose5. 5: Excellent8.4 pointsThesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.4. 4: Good7.73 pointsThesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.3. 3: Satisfactory7.39 pointsThesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory6.72 pointsPaper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.1. 1: Unsatisfactory0 pointsThesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.Argument Logic and Construction9.6 pointsCriteria DescriptionArgument Logic and Construction5. 5: Excellent9.6 pointsClear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.4. 4: Good8.83 pointsArgument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.3. 3: Satisfactory8.45 pointsArgument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory7.68 pointsSufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.1. 1: Unsatisfactory0 pointsStatement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)6 pointsCriteria DescriptionMechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)5. 5: Excellent6 pointsWriter is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.4. 4: Good5.52 pointsProse is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.3. 3: Satisfactory5.28 pointsFrequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory4.8 pointsSome mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.1. 1: Unsatisfactory0 pointsSurface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)6 pointsCriteria DescriptionPaper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)5. 5: Excellent6 pointsAll format elements are correct.4. 4: Good5.52 pointsTemplate is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style.3. 3: Satisfactory5.28 pointsTemplate is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory4.8 pointsTemplate is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent.1. 1: Unsatisfactory0 pointsTemplate is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.Documentation of Sources6 pointsCriteria DescriptionDocumentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)5. 5: Excellent6 pointsSources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.4. 4: Good5.52 pointsSources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.3. 3: Satisfactory5.28 pointsSources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory4.8 pointsDocumentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.1. 1: Unsatisfactory0 pointsSources are not documented. You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.
