Marking Rubric: Assessment Task 4 Shareholder Proposal (Total marks: 15 marks) CRITERIA HD 100% – 80% D 79% – 70% CR 69% – 60% P 59 – 50% N < 50% 1. The PROPOSAL / RESOLUTION (5 marks) The wording of the resolution Is at all times clear, expressive, logical and appropriate. Is mostly clear, expressive, logical and appropriate. Contains some lapses in clarity, expressiveness, logic and appropriateness. Contains frequent lapses in clarity, expressiveness, logic and appropriateness. Lacks clarity, expressiveness, logic and appropriateness. 2. The WHEREAS (10 marks) Your argument underpinning the WHEREAS (45%) Demonstrates great depth of analysis, evaluation and interpretation and great depth of research. Shows a very good standard of analysis, evaluation and interpretation and a very good standard of research. Shows good levels of analytical capacity and logical rigour and adequate research. Shows a basic understanding of the subject matter and limited research. Demonstrates poor understanding of the CSR issue and inadequate research. Your use of the theoretical and/or empirical argument and/or concepts that we engaged with in Topics 1 to 6 this semester. You make excellent use of the theoretical and/or empirical argument and/or concepts. You make very good use of the theoretical and/or empirical argument and/or concepts. You make good use of the theoretical and/or empirical argument and/or concepts. You make adequate use of the theoretical and/or empirical argument and/or concepts. You omit references to the theoretical and/or empirical argument and/or concepts. You support your claims with references. You compile a reference list from your research and use the correct and consistent citation format as per the assignment requirements. You include hyperlinked in-text citations in your supporting statement and attach a reference list at the end of your proposal. You include hyper- linked in-text citations and attach a reference list at the end of your proposal. You include some hyperlinked in-text citations and a partial reference list. Your in-text citations and reference list are incomplete. Your references are well chosen and illustrate your points. You make use of the authors’ arguments to support your claims. Your outside sources are highly relevant for illustrating your points. Your citations are correctly formatted. Your references are sufficiently related to your analysis. You make some use of the authors’ arguments to support your claims. Your outside sources are somewhat relevant for illustrating your points. Your citations are mostly correctly formatted. Your references are poorly related to your analysis. Your outside sources do not support your points. Your citations are inconsistently formatted.
