Order from us for quality, customized work in due time of your choice.
Its a really important essay. The teacher is really strict with everything and
Its a really important essay. The teacher is really strict with everything and is a grumpy lady.
The necessary informationnare in the CREDIT file and I am sending my last essay as well, her comment on that was:
E (which is F for her) Unmanaged non-native compilation of mostly irrelevant sources
Introduction: too long, but lets say OK (but see Quotes below)
Ch. 2 Rethinking: you didnt justify the division of verbs into action and static. (Which group would Mod and Aux be in?) meaning is not the point of the classification.
I didnt even understand the division of pronouns: as if there were two word types, both called pronouns? And in which group would relative and interrogative pronouns belong?
Whats missing is a suggestion of how some groups could be combined (it was one of the requirements in the assignment), and its not here.
Chapter 3: in the text you are just repeating what Fillmore said and what you suggest does not show that you have understood it.
And theres something about combining prepositions and conjunctions which belongs in the chapter preface. Except that after youve suggested splitting pronouns and verbs it would be (by Fillmores criteria) a very unfortunate idea. And this part of the text looks very (!!!) unoriginal. The rather sophisticated argumentation then directly contradicts what you wrote before. The conclusion is a word salad copied from who knows where.
CITATION: I have pointed out several times that in linguistics, bibliographies are NEVER footnoted! And certainly not repeatedly the same thing, just with different pages!!! Linguistics is not a historical science and has its own rules. Yours looks silly. Moreover, a reference using a footnote number obscures what actually belongs to the quote and what is your text the whole paragraph? Just one sentence? Judging by vocabulary and syntax, quite a lot of the text is non-original.
Moreover: the authors you cite must be authorities in the field
Im not sure Novak+Papcunova are among the current linguistic stars (plus its 27 years old) some dictionary would be a better source for a historical overview. And Frawley is also not the person to reveal that verbs convey agency and aspect- thats a trivial fact since Panini. I really didnt understand the relevance of Doesksens analysis of deictics in Estonian to your essay.
Being able to cite relevant authors in the right way is a significant sign of your competence, so try better next time. This way it looks like you didnt feel like formulating it in English and so you copied it.
I just need it to pass and get credits and Im getting desperate. I already paid someone before and it still didnt fly.
Order from us for quality, customized work in due time of your choice.
Share this:
FacebookX
