Traditional conservation (in the vein of fortress conservation and Michael Soules conservation biology) has largely advocated that preserving biodiversity must rely on creating protected areas and safeguarding them from human disruption/interaction as much as possible. Some counter arguments (such as Peter Kareivas conservation science) argue that humans should be more integrated into conservation, such as recognizing the conservation value of working landscapes and considering social justice when designating preserves.
Do you think conservation should seek to separate humans from nature?
Support your argument with a minimum of two citations (assigned readings or peer-reviewed research articles). For full assignment instructions, tips, and grading rubric, see the attached PDF.
