Blog

Instructions: Pick one of the following questions and write a 1,500 + word essay (around 5+ typed, double-space, pages) in response. Make sure your answer is focused on the question and give reasons, particularly in terms of moral principles.
< Submit your essay via Blackboard. < 1. Analyze the debate on active euthanasia and assisted suicide in terms of the Diane case. Does her case better support one side or the other? Why or why not? [You might want to consider the following sorts of questions: Would it be reasonable, for example, to claim that Quill “killed” his patient? Could Quill’s way of handling a case like Diane’s pose slippery-slope risks? Is Diane entitled to such assistance, in the same sense that she is entitled not to be treated?” < 2. Must patients sometimes be protected from their own decision making? Does a fully autonomous decision necessarily reflect individual well-being? Consider using Diane’s and Dax’s case or some of the others (Howe, for example) we’ve read about to focus your essay. < 3. Does an individual’s interest in making intimate and private decisions outweigh society’s interest in protecting the weak from potential abuse? Does the possibility of a slippery slope should society legalize PAS or voluntary active euthanasia justify denying the requests of patients like Diane (or maybe Dax)?