Federalist No. 57 and the Legislative Branch

Need help with assignments?

Our qualified writers can create original, plagiarism-free papers in any format you choose (APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, etc.)

Order from us for quality, customized work in due time of your choice.

Click Here To Order Now

Federalist No. 57 and the Legislative Branch

Insert name

Instructors’ name

Course

Date

Federalist No. 57 and the Legislative Branch

United States of America is one of the respected and adored countries in the world. The country has a population of about 314 million. Due to its large population, it is demarcated into several states. Prevalently, the country has fifty States; just to mention a few, California, Washington, New Hampshire, New York. America is a federal constitutional republic, that is, it is governed by the federal constitution. Apparently, the principal elective posts in the States include The President, who is the head of the State, he/she is elected by all citizens of the States. On the other hand, Senators are elected by citizens in each fifty State; this means each State has a Senator. Similarly, the Congress is an elective post; citizens of each state are allocated a given number of Congresses to elect. Apparently, if a State has a myriad population then more seats for Congress is awarded. On the other hand, if a State has less population then it is followed by fewer seats of Congress. Generally, Congress is an imperative position since it forms the House of Representative. (Frisch and Kelly 75). The House of representative is to pass laws and articulate problems affecting the populace. The paper endeavors to highlight the reasons why the House of Representative should have ample number of Congress for equal and fair representation of the citizens. It also discusses the importance of the House in line with it responsibility, this means, only right and genuine candidates should be elected to represent the citizens.

Apparently, the House of Representative is a powerful legislative branch. To start with, the house is entitled to the passage of federal legislation. Notably, this is a vital role since it concerned with the passage of laws. Typically, the congress is expected to be sober and uncompromised leaders to ensure the right laws are passed. The Congress must not at all pass only the law which favors themselves and few classes of rich people. This will cause injustice to the poor and the majority of the citizens. Similarly, the leaders in the House must also ensure they truly represent the citizens’ plights, as these ensure justice is achieved, the electorate should vote for the congress that possesses admirable virtues that include honesty, wisdom and trust (Sneider 67). Additionally, the leaders to be chosen should be affectionate to the problems, which affect the citizens. As a matter of fact, for the United States to have a House of Representatives that perform in the interest of the citizens, then the qualifications to be a congress should be made simple to allow any citizens to contest for the seat.

Apparently, the author has totally repudiated the mode which is used to elect the congress to the office. For instance, for a candidate to contest for a Congressional seat he/she should possess wealth, religious faith and civic professed. Apparently, the physical wealth should not be used as measure eligibility. This is because it limits the citizens who are poor and are capable of serving the citizens well. This means the candidates who do not possess wealth are precluded. Apparently, such a system is unfair and unjust as it does not display fairness. In addition, only few citizens are allowed to participate in the electoral process in the case of a Congress (Baughman 58). Five to Six thousand cannot choose a fit representative, in these cases the federal constitution should be amended to allow a larger population to participate in the process. As such, will ensure only candidates, who value citizen’s problems are elected, it will also ensure there is a fair representation. Since the House of Representatives is vital, the number of Congress that forms the House should be expanded. As such, limits few people who intend to serve their own selfish interest. If such powers are left in the hands of a few elevated leaders; the leaders will only make laws which favor themselves and a rich class in the society (Baughman 61). A larger House of Representative ensures there is equal representation and only laws which favor the citizens are past. Apparently, the system naturally elevates only a few leaders in the public office/ to make matters worse, the few who are elevated are mostly voted by the rich. Once they assume the office, the leaders will serve their greedy interest and the interest of the rich who placed them in the office.

Today, the United States is in line with the authors’ arguments. The political structure of America has embraced fairness and justice to the poor and constituents at large. To start with, in the 17th century, the house had a few numbers of representatives, about 65. Worth noting is the fact that the Representatives in the House now has gone to about 435. Secondly, the federal law has done away with the wealth as a qualifying factor (Sneider 44). It only requires the candidate to be a citizen of America for the last seven years and of at least 25 years and resident of the State.

In conclusion, I totally concur with the author, the elevation of the few members to the House of Representative, will lead to greediness and selfishness. As such leaders will solely serve themselves at the expense of the poor public. The number of members in the house should be increased and also a larger number of citizens be permitted to participate in the electoral process. Wealth should not be used as a qualification for a congress.

Works Cited

Frisch, Scott A. and Kelly, Sean Q. “Committee Assignment Politics In The U.S House Of Representative.” USA: University of Oklahoma Press, 2006. Print

Sneider, N. O. “House of Representative Of The United States.” New York: Nova Science Publishers, 2001. Print

Baughman, John. “Common Ground: Committee Politics In The U.S House Of Representative.” California: Stamford University Press, 2006. Print

Need help with assignments?

Our qualified writers can create original, plagiarism-free papers in any format you choose (APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, etc.)

Order from us for quality, customized work in due time of your choice.

Click Here To Order Now

Share this:
FacebookX