Jan 3, 2019 12:05 AM Yes 150.0 No Yes Week 5 Assignment: Terror Management Theory in Practice Selecting a recent terror event, one occurring with the last five (5) years, examine the practicality of the terror management theory (TMT). Work should be submitted in a Word document (doc. or docx.) or other compatible word processing document, and be , excluding the and . Scholarly sources should be cited both in-text and on the reference page of the submission. A academic, scholarly sources are required to be cited in the work. Submissions should be formatted per 6th edition (revised) APA standards. For assistance and resources on APA formatting style, please see the APUS Writing Center at The Week 5 assignment should be submitted by SUNDAY of Week 5, NLT 11:55 pm ET to the Week 5 Assignment Link accessed through the Assignments Link on the left of the main course screen. The school Late Policy applies to all course assignments and can be found in the course syllabus. Please see the assignment rubric for complete point breakdown and contact your professor with additional questions or concerns. Student accurately defines TMT and provides appropriate, practical applications for TMT. Student accurately defines TMT and provides appropriate applications; examples might have been further developed to demonstrate greater application in practical settings. Student provides an acceptable definition of TMT, with no included application of the theory. Definition and application of TMT were not included. Student identifies a specific terror event and the use of TMT to understand survivors process of coping. Details of individual differences are assessed to the extent that they affect the total behavioral health outcome. Quality resources and information are included to support the section. Student identifies a specific terror event and the use of TMT to understand survivors process of coping. Minimal examination of the individual differences between survivors were noted and greater support would have enhanced the section. Student identified a specific terror event; however, no further supporting information was included to provide context to the survivors coping process or the role of individual differences. A specific terror event was not addressed and no supporting details were included to enhance the section. Student includes a coherent, inclusive discussion in which TMT is compared to another theory examining survivor coping and response following terror events. Student includes an adequate discussion in which TMT is compared to another theory examining survivor coping and response following terror events. Student includes a discussion in which TMT is compared to another theory examining survivor coping and response following terror events.; however, many details providing context related to the best theory/approach in disaster response were lacking. The discussion of comparison/contrast of TMT and a selected theory was absent from the work. Work is presented in a logical and coherent way. Writing is clear, articulate, and error free. Work is grammatically sound with a few minor errors. Work contains frequent grammatical errors. Significant grammatical errors within the work severely affect the readability. APA formatting is complete, with all required elements identified in the instructions included within the work. APA formatting is complete with some minor errors and/or exclusions of required elements noted in the instructions. Work contains incomplete and inaccurate APA formatting. Work contains no formatting.
